Not true - branch point leaves have lines going out. ----- stephan (Sent from a mobile device, possibly from bed. Please excuse brevity, typos, and top-posting.) On Mar 19, 2015 1:06 AM, "Stephan Beal" <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Right, so only the ends of each branch would get that shape (whichever it > is). OTOH, that doesn't add any new info because one sees leaves easily by > the fact that they only have a line leading into them, not out of. But the > circles just look so nice :). > > ----- stephan > (Sent from a mobile device, possibly from bed. Please excuse brevity, > typos, and top-posting.) > On Mar 19, 2015 12:13 AM, "Andy Bradford" <amb-fos...@bradfords.org> > wrote: > >> Thus said Stephan Beal on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 23:13:56 +0100: >> >> > How about one for leaves and the other for non-leaves? >> >> Isn't a leaf easily identified by the fact that it has no descendents >> (as indicated by no edges leaving the node)? >> >> Andy >> -- >> TAI64 timestamp: 40000000550a06c1 >> >
_______________________________________________ fossil-dev mailing list fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
