On 3/18/15, Kees Nuyt <k.n...@zonnet.nl> wrote: > On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 13:53:14 -0400, you wrote: >>Please provide feedback. > > Looks great! >
They do look good, don't they. However, after living with them for a few hours, I now realize that the circles do not provide any new information. I can already clearly see which nodes are merges which are not from the inbound merge arrows. Having some nodes as circles and others as squares merely complicates the display. It provides redundant and surplus information that detracts from the important stuff. So my current thinking that the use of circles for non-merge nodes and squares for merge-nodes will not make it to trunk. But the idea of using circles to distinguish some nodes from others is appealing. We merely have to figure out what the circles should represent. Maybe circles should be used in all cases? Or maybe the use of circles versus squares should be a skin-selectable option? -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _______________________________________________ fossil-dev mailing list fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
