> I tried andygoth-brackets-outside-links. I like it better the old > way, with the brackets as part of the hyperlinks
With current fossil, it is not possible to cut and paste from browser to command line a version number. The brackets get attached to the copied text and it is necessary to manually edit the command line to remove them. I think that the alternate method avoids this problem. > Over on the https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Fossil+2.0 > wiki page, under "Other Ideas" I've added a couple of bullets about > adding the ability to put comments on check-ins and on branches. If > we had that capability right now, I would have simply put the remarks > above on branches and/or check-ins in the tree and skipped this email. > Having this kind of interaction recorded in the source tree for > historical reference seems to me desirable, though I do not yet know > what format the annotations would take. What about a technote that could optionally be attached to a commit or to a branchname? It would also be useful if included in a bundle, in order to add explanations about the bundle itself and/or the included branch. RR 2015-05-18 16:30 GMT+02:00 Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org>: > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> > Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 10:29:30 -0400 > Subject: The various andygoth-* branches > To: fossil-users <fossil-us...@mailinglists.fossil-scm.org> > > Three of six have been merged. > > andygoth-user-reports is good but needs more love before it goes onto > trunk. In particular, the submenu is too wide. I think the "(Remove > User Flag)" submenu item definitely needs to go away. General cleanup > of the /reports page is long overdue. I think all of the "By Xxxxx" > submenu items need to be collapsed into a single drop-down menu, as is > done for the "Type" on the /timeline page. Likewise, the "Types:" and > "Select year:" lines that appear on some of the graphs need to become > drop-down menus. > > I tried andygoth-brackets-outside-links. I like it better the old > way, with the brackets as part of the hyperlinks. You are going to > need to sell me on omitting the brackets from the links. > > I really do not like the andygoth-quote-apostrophe branch as it seem > to want to add a great many ' escapes into HTML output that does > not require it. What problem does this branch hope to resolve? > > Over on the https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Fossil+2.0 > wiki page, under "Other Ideas" I've added a couple of bullets about > adding the ability to put comments on check-ins and on branches. If > we had that capability right now, I would have simply put the remarks > above on branches and/or check-ins in the tree and skipped this email. > Having this kind of interaction recorded in the source tree for > historical reference seems to me desirable, though I do not yet know > what format the annotations would take. > > > -- > D. Richard Hipp > d...@sqlite.org > > > > -- > D. Richard Hipp > d...@sqlite.org > _______________________________________________ > fossil-dev mailing list > fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev _______________________________________________ fossil-dev mailing list fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
