On 9/24/2016 10:10 AM, Andy Bradford wrote:
Thus said "Joe Mistachkin" on Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:32:13 -0700:

        stash-fixes -- FIX: Seems relatively straightforward?

I think this  one is pretty much  ready, but if someone wants  to take a
look to  make sure the SQL  is right, that  might be good. I  believe it
passes all the test cases.

Take a look at this diff, specifically the changes to stash_cmd():

https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/fdiff?v1=319802c9cfcf5138&v2=f42baa6fdd6001ec&sbs=1

This seems to be the fault of the massive merge of work on trunk that was checkin [1912b2f8]. With that change to stash.c, it no longer compiles.

I can trivially revert that change, but that reveals a can of worms related to the the function db_name() and its use in numerous places that went missing from db.c.

The branch may have been good before the merge from trunk, but it is a mess right now. It needs cleanup and likely merging from something closer to the tip of trunk.

--
Ross Berteig                               r...@cheshireeng.com
Cheshire Engineering Corp.           http://www.CheshireEng.com/
+1 626 303 1602
_______________________________________________
fossil-dev mailing list
fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev

Reply via email to