On Sun, December 6, 2009 at 9:57 am, "Kurtis Rainbolt-Greene" <thinkwritem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Try closer to 40. It may be a small number compared to the amount of people > who download Fossil but I believe it to be a representative number. > > So yes, I'm calling this an "overwhelming majority". You can stick your head > in the sand if you want but this is a pretty clear cut case of: Software is > lacking, there is room for improvement, a majority desire improvement. > > This kind of stagnation over something that is clearly a needed improvement > is likely to make me walk away from Fossil. > In spite of your remarks, I don't think there is a clear consensus that some particular markup should be implemented. Your remarks don't actually contribute to obtaining such a consensus. A change will only happen when someone thinks it is important enough to spend their time implementing it. As far as the wiki markup is concerned, we are still waiting. Eric _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
