Michael Richter wrote: > > I don't get it. We never had to number the list ourselves. > What was wrong with : > > Numbered list > > 0 Number one > 0 Number two > 0 Number three > > > It gives you a list that looks like: > > 0. Number one > 0. Number two > 0. Number three > > That's not really a numbered list, now, is it?
Ahhh ... in my Fossil wiki it gives me: 1. Number one 2. Number two 3. Number three Try for yourself in the Fossil wiki's sandbox ... But pay attention: Every number enclosed in *two* Blanks! Ciao, chi. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
