On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:56:13 +0800, you wrote: >> >> I don't get it. We never had to number the list ourselves. >> What was wrong with : >> >> Numbered list >> >> 0 Number one >> 0 Number two >> 0 Number three >> >> >It gives you a list that looks like: > >0. Number one >0. Number two >0. Number three
No, it doesn't in my version of fossil, [732d7c406e] 2009-11-25 22:14:11 , nor in the newest, [484c8f9f86] 2009-12-08 18:43:51 Using Google Chrome browser v3.0.195.33 and Internet Explorer 8.0.6001.18865. But indeed, Firefox v3.5.5 shows the zeroes! Fossil generates (edited for readability): <p>Numbered list <!-- 0 0 0 case --> <ol> <li value="0">Number one</li> <li value="0">Number two</li> <li value="0">Number three</li> </ol></p> <p>Numbered list <!-- 1 2 3 case --> <ol> <li value="1">Number one</li> <li value="2">Number two</li> <li value="3">Number three</li> </ol></p> >That's not really a numbered list, now, is it? Indeed, I think we could even consider this an (understandable) bug. Ok, Jeremy has a point in adding a non-digit as a token for a automatically numbered list, and seeding the enumeration value only if an explicit digit is given. -- ( Kees Nuyt ) c[_] _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
