On Tuesday 23 February 2010 18:16:59 D. Richard Hipp wrote: > > I get the impression that I am perhaps the only person in the world > who cares about PGP signing their check-ins. So rather than burden > all other users with having to figure out PGP/GPG, what it is, how it > works, and why Fossil cares about it, I think it is better to simply > Fossil for the common user and leave PGP signing off by default. This > helps to make Fossil more accessible to newbies.
I would be more interested if it were possible to require the checkin be signed, and perhaps if there were a way to only accept signatures from a whitelist of keys. As it is currently, though I am a real fan of GPG I don't see much utility in the way it is currently used in Fossil. -- Sending me something private? Use my GPG public key: AD29415D
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
