> From: Gour <g...@gour-nitai.com> > I'm still in the evaluating phase for Fossil, but being an Emacs > user, I'm curious why you're integrating into VC and not DVC? > (http://www.xsteve.at/prg/emacs_dvc/dvc.html)
Two answers. 1. I had to make it as painless as possible for my users (who unfortunately are more used to traditional VCS). I'm currently tracking fossil head with minor changes to 2 files, so it's been a relatively successful project for me. 2. I had never heard of dvc. I'm sure I can make it work with fossil. But if the user experience is much different, then I'm not helping my users. I really didn't have a choice. I wanted fossil, my users absolutely needed it to work with emacs vc. Would you recommend DVC over VC? Why? - Venkat _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
