On Wed, 5 May 2010 21:16:39 -0700 >>>>>> "Venkat" == Venkat Iyer wrote:
Venkat> 1. I had to make it as painless as possible for my users (who Venkat> unfortunately are more used to traditional VCS). I'm Venkat> currently tracking fossil head with minor changes to 2 files, Venkat> so it's been a relatively successful project for me. OK. Venkat> 2. I had never heard of dvc. I'm sure I can make it work with Venkat> fossil. But if the user experience is much different, then I'm Venkat> not helping my users. I see. Venkat> Would you recommend DVC over VC? Why? Simpy because it says: DVC: Distributed Version Control for Emacs, i.e. I consider that Fossil is in the category of DVCS and therefore having support in DVC seems more natural, especially if users ahve to deal with more than one system, then DVC (simlar to VC) brings some useful abstraction. Otoh, I still wait to receive some reply on my post to find out whether Fossil's users are living in isolated universe or not. :-D Sincerely, Gour -- Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: F96FF5F6 ----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
