Oh, one more thing I wanted to say.... Fossil is awesome with not just it's integrated ticket and wiki system but it's integrated and DISTRIBUTED ticket and wiki system. That's huge. Other SCM's can't touch it even with Redmine/Trac. One suggested just using a distributed ticket system that stores it's tickets in the repo. That works for the developers, but what if some user comes along on the web interface and adds a new ticket? No one has been able to achieve that (yet).
But, for all that, the lack of a complete wiki syntax (i.e. wiki = quick quick, not HTML!) still kills it for others and has just about killed it for me. I still have about 2% of my heart in continuing with Fossil, but that's not much. Fossil has the potential to be a fantastic piece of software but is shooting itself in the foot with a huge canon with it's so-called, non-standard wiki syntax. Again, I'm not saying there is ONE wiki syntax that EVERYONE uses, but I am saying there ARE a few STANDARD wiki formats, of which Fossil wants nothing to do with for some reason that's far beyond me. Jeremy _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
