On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Zed A. Shaw <[email protected]> wrote:

> Just curious, but what was the reason again that nobody shouldn't get
> the history setting?  I can see that it might allow spiders to crawl the
> whole source tree and maybe download Zips but was there any other
> motivation?
>

Blocking spiders (especially those that ignore robots.txt) is the only
reason I have for "history".


>
> I ask because most of the panzies who use my stuff come from github
> where there's not as many features so they just turn everything on and
> let the bots crawl.  These programmers then consider any kind of
> anonymous login as crushing their creative soul and harshing the
> hippie buzz.
>

> So I'm going to open it up, but want to make sure I'm not doing anything
> stupid.
>
>
In the latest versions of Fossil, I have included the latest betas of SQLite
3.7.0 with write-ahead log (WAL) support.  Using these versions, if you set
"PRAGMA journal_mode=WAL" on your repository database (using a recent beta
of SQLite) then you will get better concurrency on your server - multiple
users can be reading from different versions of the database at the same
time and you are far, far less likely to encounter a "busy timeout" error.
This might become more important if user "nobody" has "history" permission.



> --
> Zed A. Shaw
> http://zedshaw.com/
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>



-- 
---------------------
D. Richard Hipp
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to