On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:33:26PM +0200, renework wrote: > On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:29:43 -0700, "Zed A. Shaw" <[email protected]> > wrote: > Wiki isn't meant for that > http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_purpose_of_a_wiki states
That's a dogmatic assertion that confuses the two use cases. The use case for wiki in fossil is "user inputed things to display, sometimes docs". The use case for html in /doc/tip is "generated and crafted documentation by trusted people with commit rights." Two totally different things. > Unifying creole, textile, fossil-wiki, html and text is a way forward, > which tends to bloat fossil. You can't have your cake and eat it too > :-) Again, different discussion I'm not going to get into. I agree with Rich that the fossil wiki format is just fine. All I'm wanting is a way to publish docs as html so they fit into the site design I've made and have the login state. If you want different wiki formats then I say use a generator. Otherwise the format that's there works and changing it now would suck for lots of people. -- Zed A. Shaw http://zedshaw.com/ _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
