On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 09:46:14PM +0100, Eric wrote: > On Mon, July 26, 2010 9:33 pm, "renework" <[email protected]> wrote: > > <snip/> > > > But that defeats fossil and the wiki system because we (wrongly) want > > to use wiki for generating the manual. > > <snip/> > > > Maybe it is good to take a step back and state first what the purpose > > is of the wiki system in fossil. > > Which will give guidance to us all. > > > > Thankyou. I tried to say much the same some time ago, but you have made a > better job of it.
But again, none of this matters for my point. I'm not talking about wiki, I'm talking about HTML documentation. If there was a way to generate HTML using any of the many docs generators out there, and then check it into fossil so that fossil styles it, then you could use whatever wiki format you wanted. It would future proof and satisfy all the whiners. -- Zed A. Shaw http://zedshaw.com/ _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
