On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:09:58 -05 wrote: Richard> So in summary - Fossil appears to already do everything that Richard> git-stash does and do it at least as easily as git-stash. Richard> Furthermore, I think for the sake of usability that is Richard> important to keep Fossil as simple as possible and avoid Richard> adding unneeded features. And for those reasons, I'm thinking Richard> it would not be a good idea to add a stash to Fossil. But I Richard> am open to arguments to the contrary. Richard> Richard> What say you?
I agree...That's because Fossil is, in comparison with Git, properly designed while Git is more or less bunch of hacks thrown together with horrible UI on top of that...and now it's not easy to fix it. :-) Sincerely, Gour -- Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA ----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
