On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 08:09:58PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Joshua Paine <jos...@letterblock.com>wrote: > > > > > It would be nice to have something like `git stash`, too. Probably the > > biggest thing I miss from git. > > > > > I've been reading up on git-stash to see if Fossil needs a similar feature. > So far I don't see the need, since stash doesn't do anything that Fossil > doesn't already handle more or less automatically. Please enlighten me if > I'm missing something obvious.... I agree, I never saw what would be 'stash' useful for, in fossil.
When I used git, I used stash though. As in fossil, git users can branch at any point, commit on private branches and all that. But I think that there 'stash' got in because the git manuals somehow end up advising against branching "too much". Additionally, I think that git programmers tend up to choose it as it allows "more unorganized ways of storing private things". And related to 'stash', I enjoy fossil not having the INDEX and the Working Directory. Thank you, Lluís. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
