> Any reason for not using one of the established web servers that > actually implement the specs correctly? E.g. with nginx you can either > hook up "fossil http" via inetd or directly proxying "fossil server".
If I understand it correctly fossil uses non-parsed headers in its answers (runs as a non-pased header script). In the CGI 1.1 specification you can find this: 5 5.1 NPH Scripts Identification The server MAY support NPH (Non-Parsed Header) scripts; these are scripts to which the server passes all responsibility for response processing. Bauk didn't imlpement it - if I got that right - but that's right because the specs are implemented correctly. I like Bauk and its features and won't install other servers/applications. Regards, Feri _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
