2011/1/17 Kulcsár Ferenc <crusa...@netbsd.hu>

>
> If I understand it correctly fossil uses non-parsed headers in its answers
> (runs as a non-pased header script).
>

I don't think so.  The webserver on the http://www.fossil-scm.org/ website
does not support non-parsed headers but it supports Fossil just fine.

I suppose the previous sentence depends on your definition of "non-parsed
headers".  The webserver at http://www.fossil-scm.org/ certainly does look
at and parse the result it receives from CGI prior to relaying it back to
the requester.



-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to