On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Martin Gagnon <eme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've convert a git repository to fossil and I'm a bit confuse with my > tags I had in git, the way they become in fossil. > > I had some tag in the original git repo, which was not branch, only a > tag to a particular version. Once I convert to fossil, those tag > propagate to future versions until next tag is reach. Those tags > seems to be like real branches after conversion to fossil. > > Did someone else get the same problem? Or I miss something? > I've seen the same thing. Either I'm misunderstanding the git-fast-export file format documentation or else git-fast-export is getting branches and tags confused. I'm not sure which it is, but I am leaning toward the problem being in git-fast-export. Others have reported issues with that tool, and the documentation for git-fast-export itself explains that it cannot successfully export the Linux kernel repository.... I've got some ideas on how I might work around the (presumed) brokenness in git-fast-export. If you are able to send me the output of git-fast-export from your repository, or let me clone you git repository, that will give me another example repository to work with. > > Thanks > > -- > Martin > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
