On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Martin Gagnon <eme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I've convert a git repository to fossil and I'm a bit confuse with my >> tags I had in git, the way they become in fossil. >> >> I had some tag in the original git repo, which was not branch, only a >> tag to a particular version. Once I convert to fossil, those tag >> propagate to future versions until next tag is reach. Those tags >> seems to be like real branches after conversion to fossil. >> >> Did someone else get the same problem? Or I miss something? > > I've seen the same thing. > > Either I'm misunderstanding the git-fast-export file format documentation or > else git-fast-export is getting branches and tags confused. I'm not sure > which it is, but I am leaning toward the problem being in git-fast-export. > Others have reported issues with that tool, and the documentation for > git-fast-export itself explains that it cannot successfully export the Linux > kernel repository.... > > I've got some ideas on how I might work around the (presumed) brokenness in > git-fast-export. If you are able to send me the output of git-fast-export > from your repository, or let me clone you git repository, that will give me > another example repository to work with. > >
I have another test, I don't know if it's because of very close timestamps, but the graph of this one on fossil look weird (attached file: git_tags_export_test2.sh) Look at 200 Entries.... -- Martin
git_tags_export_test2.sh
Description: Bourne shell script
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
