On 21/07/2011, at 6:14 AM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: > > On Jul 20, 2011, at 21:18 , Eric wrote: > >>> +1 >> >> Oh, for heaven's sake! We did this before: >> >> 1) there's no pleasing everybody (we all have our different favourites) > > But most people agree that any of markdown/restructuredtext/dokuwiki/whatever > simple syntax is nicer than html-based markup. > >> 2) if its not available as a single-file C API, it's probably not going in >> anyway (and insisting that it be a library is just as restrictive) > > > At some point of this discussion there was an author willing to contribute > his (her?) markdown-mangling C code. But this author did not want to delve > into inner workings of Fossil, only offered code with good license and help > to whoever integrates that. But nobody volunteered to be the integrator.
Discount (http://www.pell.portland.or.us/~orc/Code/discount/) is probably relatively easy to integrate and the licence is OK. Still needs somebody to do the work though. Cheers, Steve -- µWeb: Embedded Web Framework - http://uweb.workware.net.au/ WorkWare Systems Pty Ltd W: www.workware.net.au P: +61 434 921 300 E: ste...@workware.net.au F: +61 7 3391 6002 _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
