I really do appreciate all the patches to Fossil that have been coming in lately. Thanks for the help!!!
But if you look at the timeline ( http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?c=2011-08-24&n=40) you'll see that contributors are putting changes in branches to which they have assigned a background color or red or pink. I don't have any fundamental objections to pink, but I would prefer it to be used in moderation. For a month now (ever since http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/c946b573c7) Fossil has been choosing branch colors automatically based on a hash of the branch name. And this technique has proven remarkably effective. Behold the the appearance of the timelime ( http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?c=2011-08-24&n=40&brbg) when Fossil gets to choose its own branch colors. You still see a pink branch now and then, but like I said before, an occasional pink branch is fine. It only gets annoying when every branch is pink. Would anybody object if I go back to the initial check-ins on some of the pink branches, and remove their explicit color tag, thus allowing Fossil to pick its own branch colors? Once again, thank you all for the contributions. I'd rather have pink contributions than no contributions at all. But contributions in a variety of pleasing earth-tones would be better still! -- D. Richard Hipp [email protected]
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
