-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/08/2011 09:27 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Martin S. Weber <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On 09/08/11 16:01, Stephan Beal wrote: >> >>> 1) A split between library and app. i.e. libfossil vs. the fossil >>> server/cgi/shell app(s) >>> >> >> I couldn't agree more. One of my goals (luckily no milestone I'll ever be >> evaluated against) is to do that. >> > > i can promise you that "herculean effort" was not a hyperbole! That said, i > would be happy to assist you in this, and i think it can be done > incrementally, taking a long time to do but having no outwardly effect on > the apps.
What will this mean for the famed "single binary, just copy it into your PATH" effect? Will said single binary still exist and statically link libfossil into itself, but also have a libfossil.so available alongside? ABS - -- Alaric Snell-Pym http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5pz4sACgkQRgz/WHNxCGrFLACcCz9R9FPxtRvjJOxlX8FtkL9q 3C8An2ZHKw8QupPr2NUxZxcB+LcuY0uu =acGv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
