On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Alaric Snell-Pym <ala...@snell-pym.org.uk>wrote:
> What will this mean for the famed "single binary, just copy it into your > PATH" effect? Will said single binary still exist and statically link > libfossil into itself, but also have a libfossil.so available alongside? > A single-binary build would still be required, i believe, if only due to Fossil's long and glorious history of being buildable that way (much to our benefit). Such a restructure would be more to enable other apps rather than hinder the main app. But in any case we're a long way from such a split (if it ever materializes at all - it would require a very large undertaking). -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
