On 10/16/11 21:34, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote: >>> I'm still searching for better terminology than "1-pane" and >>> "2-pane" diffs. Any opinions? >>> >>> "Condensed" vs "Expanded"? >>> >>> "Terse" vs "Verbose"? >>> >> i like side-by-side, but i don't have a suggestion for 1-pane diffs. >> >> Maybe "tall" and "wide" diffs? > > "Side-by-side diffs" and "Unified diffs"?
Perhaps I'm nitpicking too much, but I was looking for a single word rather than "side-by-side" in the UI (in the code I don't mind). And the reason I haven't gone with "unified" is because I thought that it may confuse users to think it refers specifically to the unified format (which I suppose it doesn't really; they just happen to coincide). Though to be honest, my first though was to use "side-by-side" and "unified". In what may become a case of coming to a closed circle, perhaps I should simply go with it. Ugh -- epic bikeshedding. I'll just go with it. Or is anyone directly opposed to using "Side-by-side" (with hyphens) and "Unified"? Speak now, or rename it yourself later. :) -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
