+1 for fossil doing my file handling ;) +1 for an option to retain old CVS behavior.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Ramon Ribó <ram...@compassis.com> wrote: > In my opinion, this option should be changed without fear. If fossil > is ready to delete the files when doing an "update", why not delete > them when doing a "rm"? > > In any case, just print something like in the revert case: "use fossil > undo to get the file again" > > RR > > > > 2011/12/21 Dmitry Chestnykh <dmi...@codingrobots.com>: >> If we're having a vote, +1. I'd like it if rm and mv actually deleted >> and renamed files. >> > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
