On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 03:56:51PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > I don't know how back-compatible are linux-headers, but glibc can be built > > with > > "--enable-kernel=2.6.0" or "--enable-kernel=2.4.0", something like that. > > Maybe > > only that already determines what syscalls glibc will use. In any case, > > this > > means to build a new glibc. > > > > > Untested, but _maybe_ you could build against ulibc? > > http://www.uclibc.org/
That will statically link *name resolution*, at least, but may not solve the problems about the version of the linux syscalls used, unless telling uclibc what syscall version to use. glibc does not provide a statically-linkable name resolution (hosts, users, ... whatever). _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
