On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 18:57:23 +0200, [email protected] 
wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Rene <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >       1) Ubuntu version ?? libc  ??
> >
>       2) Fedora version ?? libc  ??
> > Mine
> >
> 
> AFAIK, glibc has not been able to statically link the networking libs for
> many years. This affects not only fossil, but also clients of libv8 (even
> though it only uses networking for internal comms within its own debugger),
> libmysql, and several other libs i've worked with.
> 
> Solaris hasn't, for several years, supported static linking against system
> libs (at all). It just caused too much compatibility grief for them
> long-term.
> 
> 
> If I compile against uclibc(=32 bits) I get 3.6M after strip 1.3M after
> > gzip -9 638K.
> >
> > If you want de uclibc executable drop me a line.
> 
> 
> Out of curiosity: what build flags are needed for building against uclib?
None, only set tcc=i686-linux-gcc
PATH=$ulib/usr/bin:$PATH make
> 
> -- 
> ----- stephan beal
> http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
> http://gplus.to/sgbeal

_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to