On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Tomek Kott <[email protected]> wrote:
> Richard, > > fossil rebuild repo doesn't help. However, fossil test-integrity gives: > > checksum mismatch on artifact 20: wanted > 54cfcee26873b585462c057e779eda2f4d1185c0 but got > da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef956018 > 90afd80709 > checksum mismatch on artifact 21: wanted > 80fb936bd1afff7042cf83485e1710edaa2a03fc but got > da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef956018 > 90afd80709 > da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef956018 is the SHA1 hash of an empty file. So for some reason or another, artifacts 20 and 21 are not getting transferred as part of the clone. Have you shunned anything in this repo? > skip phantom 25 2fc9f661810373fe08bf2bbf31d942c4ac985fbc > 31 non-phantom blobs (out of 32 total) checked: 2 errors > > For the cloned repo, while the original (file copied) repo gives 0 errors. > Recloning surprising gives the exact same errors and checksums. > > Tomek > > > > ------------------------------ > From: [email protected] > Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:58:41 -0400 > > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Corrupt cloning of private repo > > > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Tomek Kott <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Are there any tests I can perform? > > > "fossil rebuild $REPO" is a good test. Also "fossil test-integrity $REPO". > > > > -- > D. Richard Hipp > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > > -- D. Richard Hipp [email protected]
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
