Them fence posts will get you every time!

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Richard Hipp <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for the repo.  The one-character fix for your problem is here:
> http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/0db6f981bf
>
> Sorry about the bug.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Richard Hipp <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Send me the original (working) repo by private email and I'll debug it
>> for you.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Tomek Kott <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> > Have you shunned anything in this repo?
>>>
>>> Nope, this is almost as plain vanilla as can be. Four commits, about 20
>>> files, and everything in the trunk. I'm using my own skin, but that
>>> shouldn't change things.
>>>
>>> Tomek
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:30:19 -0400
>>>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Corrupt cloning of private repo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Tomek Kott <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>> Richard,
>>>
>>> fossil rebuild repo doesn't help. However, fossil test-integrity gives:
>>>
>>> checksum mismatch on artifact 20: wanted
>>> 54cfcee26873b585462c057e779eda2f4d1185c0 but got
>>> da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef956018
>>> 90afd80709
>>> checksum mismatch on artifact 21: wanted
>>> 80fb936bd1afff7042cf83485e1710edaa2a03fc but got
>>> da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef956018
>>> 90afd80709
>>>
>>>
>>> da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef956018 is the SHA1 hash of an empty file.  So
>>> for some reason or another, artifacts 20 and 21 are not getting transferred
>>> as part of the clone.
>>>
>>> Have you shunned anything in this repo?
>>>
>>>
>>> skip phantom 25 2fc9f661810373fe08bf2bbf31d942c4ac985fbc
>>> 31 non-phantom blobs (out of 32 total) checked:  2 errors
>>>
>>> For the cloned repo, while the original (file copied) repo gives 0
>>> errors. Recloning surprising gives the exact same errors and checksums.
>>>
>>> Tomek
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:58:41 -0400
>>>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Corrupt cloning of private repo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Tomek Kott <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Are there any tests I can perform?
>>>
>>>
>>> "fossil rebuild $REPO" is a good test.  Also "fossil test-integrity
>>> $REPO".
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> D. Richard Hipp
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing
>>> list [email protected]
>>> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> fossil-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> D. Richard Hipp
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing
>>> list [email protected]
>>> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> fossil-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> D. Richard Hipp
>> [email protected]
>>
>
>
>
> --
> D. Richard Hipp
> [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to