Rest assured that even if "weird" features like rebasing were to "pollute" Fossil, no one would force you to use them :)
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Michael L. Barrow <mlbar...@barrow.me>wrote: > > I'm a faithful Fossil user and I have enjoyed its "limitations" compared > to Git because I consider them features. And pardon my commentary as I > typically lurk on the list rather than provide ongoing input to the > development. > > If Git does all of this fancy stuff already, why not just use Git? Why > must the beauty and simplicity of Fossil be 'polluted' with this additional > baggage? > > And, if you like some of what Fossil does and some of what Git does, then > go and make a bastard stepchild of the two, but please do not advocate > putting a bunch of "weird" stuff into Fossil! > > *phew* I feel better now that I've said that... > > :-) > > -- > michael at barrow dot me > +1.408.782.4249 > > > ______________________________**_________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.**org <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:**8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**fossil-users<http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users> >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
