On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Michael L. Barrow <mlbar...@barrow.me>wrote:
> On 9/14/12 11:53 AM, Bill Burdick wrote: > >> Rest assured that even if "weird" features like rebasing were to >> "pollute" Fossil, no one would force you to use them :) >> >> But the size and complexity of the resulting application which is known > for being well-engineered could suffer... True for a generic, unknown feature, maybe, but not for rebasing, I think. Rebasing could be implemented without changing the codebase at all, just using the fossil command in a script. A lot of extensions could be done as external scripts -- both Fossil and Git are very easy to extend, that way. They both have good architectures; Fossil's is SQL and Git's is NoSQL :). Bill
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
