On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Gour <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:13:44 -0400
> Richard Hipp <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > See - here you got to the latest check-in.  Notice that this check-in
> > is *not* taked with "trunk".  It's part of a different branch,
> > somehow or another.
>
> My Git history is 100% linear and single branch.
>
> However, import from Git into Fossil show two branches and one is 'as
> without origin' - see fossil-init.jpg - so I cannot merge the two not
> having common ancestor.
>
> Moreover, Fossil import skipped one revision marked as
>
> #tryton -->on, #geany --> off & update logs
>
> (compare git.jpg with fossil.jpg) which happens right after the 'split'.
>
> Any idea and/or what to do to somehow merge those two 'branches' ?
>

There must be some quirk or hiccup in the fast-export data that is causing
Fossil to be unable to interpret the missing revision.  And that missing
revision in turn causes the linear sequence of check-ins to be split into
two.

Without seeing the fast-export content, I cannot speculate on what that
quirk or hiccup might be.


>
> Otherwise, the conversion should be pretty straightforward - 110
> revisions in a single linear tree...
>
> Sincerely,
> Gour
>
> --
> He who is satisfied with gain which comes of its own accord, who
> is free from duality and does not envy, who is steady in both
> success and failure, is never entangled, although performing actions.
>
> http://www.atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
>
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
>


-- 
D. Richard Hipp
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to