It seems like, at least for now, you ought to patch your own copy--I'm not seeing any strong general response that that's a good or needed change to make, so you could be waiting a while if you're waiting on the main devs for this.
On 10/28/2012 09:57 AM, K wrote: > > On Oct 26, 2012, Carlo Miron <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:11 PM, K <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Oct 26, 2012, Carlo Miron <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:28 AM, K <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On Oct 24, 2012, Ron Aaron <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Wouldn't it be better to make this a parameter the user can adjust >>>>>> rather than permitting any length? >>>>> While this is a more complex solution, I would support it. Perhaps in the >>>>> Admin >>>> area, some option to control the minimum wiki name length, defaulting to 3. >>>>> Input from others? >>>> To me, it seems completely YAGNI. >>> I'm not familiar with that acronym. Would you please clarify? >> Sorry. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_ain't_gonna_need_it> > So should we then just integrate the diff into the official branch which > reduces the length requirement of wikis from 3 characters to 1? > > ^K > >> © >> -- >> R >> K-<M>-S >> L >> _______________________________________________ >> fossil-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >> > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
