On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Gautier DI FOLCO <[email protected] > wrote:
> Hi all, > > I have learned many things on fossil with the wiki but, even if how fossil > manages branches is described I haven't seen why branches are differents > directory (like bzr) instead of being the same directory with differents > files > (like git or hg)? > Fossil does branching like monotone, git, and hg, not like svn. Different branches are in the same directory. Why leads you to believe otherwise? > Is it a technical problem? If yes, someone can be interessed by having > this feature? > Is this a philosophic choice? If yes, can you explain it to me because > I don't see any drawbacks of having only one directory, it is so handy. > > For you help, > Thanks by advance. > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > > -- D. Richard Hipp [email protected]
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
