On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Richard Hipp <[email protected]> wrote:
> So Altu and Eric (and also Joe Mistachkin on a back-channel) have pretty > much convinced me at this point to keep the current behavior of "fossil rm" > and "fossil mv". I'm happy to read this. Thank you. I had refrained to chime in the discussion so far, because I was not sure about how to articulate my point of view. Now I think the point is, it is good practice that processes responsible for creating/opening/locking a resource must be the same responsible for deleting/closing/unlocking them. If I manually create a file, it must be me to manually delete it when I don't need it anymore. It must not be deleted as a side effect of some other thing. And no, saving a few keystrokes does not balance this. Cheers P. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
