Hi, While, ceteris paribus, I'd certainly prefer Python, I definitely understand that embedding CPython may be more trouble than it's worth. If you are going to embed *something*, I'd vote for a langauge explicitly designed with that purpose in mind, say, Lua.
However, if this is to happen, I really do think that Fossil shouldn't have more than one embedded dynamic language. So, either we do everything with TH1, or we have something that replaces TH1... Definitely a huge +1 for hooks, though; I'd be perfectly happy with something that gets passed to system(3)... lvh
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users