Hi,

While, ceteris paribus, I'd certainly prefer Python, I definitely
understand that embedding CPython may be more trouble than it's worth. If
you are going to embed *something*, I'd vote for a langauge explicitly
designed with that purpose in mind, say, Lua.

However, if this is to happen, I really do think that Fossil shouldn't have
more than one embedded dynamic language. So, either we do everything with
TH1, or we have something that replaces TH1...

Definitely a huge +1 for hooks, though; I'd be perfectly happy with
something that gets passed to system(3)...

lvh
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to