On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:06 PM, David Given <d...@cowlark.com> wrote:
> ....SHAs more readable; fortunately I never got around to implementing > it... > ...t to call it 'CORRECT HORSE BATTERY', or 'CASE NIGHTMARE GREEN', or > 'LUMINOUS PANDA UKELELE', or whatever. > LOL! Yes, thank goodness you never implemented it ;). XKCD actually had a comic on that: http://xkcd.com/936/ he "proves" that CORRECT HORSE BATTERY is actually less secure because it's more memorable (see, you've already memorized it ;). > Done right this gives a lossless bidirectional mapping from hashes to > codenames. The difficult bit, of course, is coming up with the codename > dictionary (and being able to use the codenames with a straight face). > i would certainly like to see a proof of concept, but i can't imagine being taken seriously when i post a message saying, "guys, can you please review commit BASIC ORANGE MONKEY and tell me what you think?" ;) But that WOULD be a funny proof-of-concept plugin for the v2 API. -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
