On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:02 AM, j. van den hoff <veedeeh...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> > I view the download facility mainly as a convenience for "anonymous" to > get hold of the managed files for a certain revision without the need > to clone the whole repo. at least in this use case it sure would suffice > to use a fixed_string+sha1 as the identifier (e.g. `fossil' plus the sha1). > actually I feel it would be easier for the user. so what are the benefits > of using project-name derived (and usually unwieldy) long names for the > generated archives? > I think the point is that the "Project Name" is suppose to be that short prefix, not a long description of the project. So for your repo, the "Project Name" should be "veedeehjay-papers" or "articles" or "papers", not "Journal Articles (LaTeX) Collected by J. Van Den Hoff". -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
