Hello! On 15 Nov 2013 16:12:17 -0700 "Andy Bradford" <[email protected]> wrote: > Thus said [email protected] on Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:37:53 > +0000: > > > So this time, it actually asked me for a password on cloning (which I > > don't remember it ever doing before). I entered the password that was > > printed when the repository was created on the server side and it > > seemed happy. > > What are the capablities of the nobody user in the 44 repositories that > you are able to clone from and write to without specifying a username in > the URL.
"gjor" > What is the result of running ``fossil remote-url'' in one of these > opened repositories that you cloned without a username? Oh dear... I think we've found the problem. I'd cloned the original repositories over SSH on the same server! I've no idea why I thought it was over HTTP before. I'm not sure this explains the apparently inconsistent behaviour in my last email, but it would at least explain why I've not run into it to date. Apologies for the noise (if it turns out that there isn't actually a problem here). > Finally, what version of fossil were you using when you cloned of the 44 > repositories originally? I've been updating every couple of weeks since 1.24, so it's a bit of a mix. Think it's probably irrelevant though... M _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
