On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Andy Bradford <[email protected]>wrote:
> Thus said Matt Welland on Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:01:30 -0700: > > > Do you now have: > > > > -> a -> c -> > > > > OR > > > > -> a c -> > > What about: > > -> a => c -> > > Where => is a new line style that indicates a hidden line of commits > between a and c? > I vote for the => to make it clear there are hidden commits. At the same time, I find it strange to hide commits whose content is still being used (unless "c" is just a reversion of those changes, but then I'd just commit against "a", leaving "b" as an abandoned fork/branch)
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
