b is not a fork, nor is it abandoned. think of it as math. The delta a-c is equal to the sum of a-b and b-c. You can hide b and think in terms of a-c just fine. The only complication is if other branches derive from b. but that is up to the user to think carefully and mean what they say when they hide stuff.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Ron Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Andy Bradford > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Thus said Matt Welland on Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:01:30 -0700: >> >> >> > Do you now have: >> > >> > -> a -> c -> >> > >> > OR >> > >> > -> a c -> >> >> What about: >> >> -> a => c -> >> >> Where => is a new line style that indicates a hidden line of commits >> between a and c? >> > > I vote for the => to make it clear there are hidden commits. > > At the same time, I find it strange to hide commits whose content is still > being used (unless "c" is just a reversion of those changes, but then I'd > just commit against "a", leaving "b" as an abandoned fork/branch) > > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > > -- Matt -=- 90% of the nations wealth is held by 2% of the people. Bummer to be in the majority...
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
