On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:19 PM, j. van den hoff <veedeeh...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> > thanks for this. question: the output of `fossil search' is not > chronologically sorted. it should be in my view (top down, that is, from > new to old just as the timeline). is this intended behaviour? > > another observation: I see strange hits in the search. e.g. (still for the > fossil timeline) > > `fossil search abc' yields (upon others, obviously correct hits) a hit for > rev. 94694585cd which seemingly is a commit with an empty commit > message... looks like a bug to me. > Yeah. The whole "fossil search" command was an idea that I tried several years ago. But I didn't spend enough time on it to drive it to completion. It needs attention. Do we have your contributor's agreement on file? Wanna help? -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
