On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:19 PM, j. van den hoff

> thanks for this. question: the output of `fossil search' is not
> chronologically sorted. it should be in my view (top down, that is, from
> new to old just as the timeline). is this intended behaviour?
> another observation: I see strange hits in the search. e.g. (still for the
> fossil timeline)
> `fossil search abc' yields (upon others, obviously correct hits) a hit for
>  rev. 94694585cd which seemingly is a commit with an empty commit
> message... looks like a bug to me.

Yeah.  The whole "fossil search" command was an idea that I tried several
years ago.  But I didn't spend enough time on it to drive it to
completion.  It needs attention.  Do we have your contributor's agreement
on file?  Wanna help?

D. Richard Hipp
fossil-users mailing list

Reply via email to