On Jun 5, 2014 10:55 AM, "Richard Hipp" <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Andy Bradford <amb-fos...@bradfords.org> wrote: >> >> Thus said Warren Young on Thu, 05 Jun 2014 09:25:39 -0600: >> >> > A contribution from an untrusted outsider needs to be checked >> > carefully before it is committed to the master repo. >> >> Certainly. >> >> fossil open subrepo.fossil >> # inspect >> fossil ui subrepo.fossil >> # inspect >> >> I'm not sure how many artifacts would actually be required to make this >> work, but it does seem possib le. Maybe it's too simplistic an approach >> and it would actually require attaching another DB as has been >> suggested. >> > > If you included all the artifacts that you need, that would immediately make the subrepo larger than you might expect. Certainly the subrepo would be smaller if you only included artifacts that actually changed, and even then only included deltas and not the complete text. > > But maybe there should be an open to the "fossil submit" or "fossil subrepo" command (whatever it ends up being called)
A fossil "partial"? > so that you can specify either a dependent or an independent subrepository. Dependent would be the default. But you could request an independent subrepo if you wanted to and space wasn't an issue. > > > -- > D. Richard Hipp > d...@sqlite.org > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
