On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 6:38 PM, B Harder <brad.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jun 5, 2014 10:55 AM, "Richard Hipp" <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > > > If you included all the artifacts that you need, that would immediately > make the subrepo larger than you might expect. Certainly the subrepo would > be smaller if you only included artifacts that actually changed, and even > then only included deltas and not the complete text. > > > > But maybe there should be an open to the "fossil submit" or "fossil > subrepo" command (whatever it ends up being called) > > A fossil "partial"? > Thinking about this, I am wondering what would happen if: 1. clone the main repo 2. Mark the root of the clone "private", making the whole clone private 3. Start a branch for the local changes and mark that branch not private 4. Commit changes to the new branch 5. Clone the clone Would the second clone be just the new branch?
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
