On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Gour <g...@atmarama.net> wrote: > I use lto-2 tapes, but the point is that Fossil keeps project's history > since the very beginning. :-)
Still need to keep the Fossil repo backed up. But yes, I like that Fossil is designed to preserve the history instead of being used as a tool to "organize" "history". My point was that many non-Fossil users think that using the VCS as a tool to "organize" "history" is a great idea. It is possible to "organize" "history" in Fossil by doing your work on private branches, then creating "organized" views in your work space and committing those to trunk and/or release branches. (I have no idea how this procedure compares to rebase in git and some other VCSs. I've never used rebase. and while my release branches have only major commits in them, I don't do anything special to "organize" them, nor do I make my dev branches private.)
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
