On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Ron W <ronw.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think perhaps your experimental subjects are expecting that to be the > answer. >
Very possibly. > I think a better experiment might be to find a complex change one of them > made, then ask them to explain to you what they were trying to do. > > Or, maybe, pick a complex issue then, after you devise the real fix, > devise a bizarre version of the fix - without any reference to the issue - > then let them try to review that. > LOL! That's not a bad idea, especially if they wait until 4 weeks after the commit to review it, in which case i can answer any questions with, "how should i know? That was four weeks ago! Did nobody write a ticket number in the comments? ;)" -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
