On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Stephan Beal <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Ron W <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The "sym-" one not having a value. Strange to me that 2 tags would be >> used (I would have thought only the "branch" tag), but looks like the >> "sym-" tag could be used to hold a branch description. >> > > One downside: this precludes modifying the description without yet another > tag applied to amend it. Similar to the comment tag, but a comment tag is > cached in the 'event' table (ecomment field), so it's not expensive to > calculate later on. It sounds like this change would need a similar place > to store the most recent description. > In that case, a possible alternative would be a simple way to display (including amendments) the comment from the branch's first commit (as that seems to be a common convention for describing a branch).
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
