On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Stephan Beal <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Andreas Kupries <[email protected] > > wrote: >> >> I.e. the command implementation would have to detect the unchanged >> files on update and skip them. >> > > Which would almost certainly once in a blue moon, as a side-effect of > external forces, have a false negative and cause grief? The current > behaviour is "slow but sure," but obviously inadequate (or "over-adequate") > for massive repos. > Does the check-out DB record the mtime and size of the files in the check-out? If so, you have at least some defence against false negatives.
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
