Hello, On 2 February 2015 at 19:46, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2 February 2015 at 10:32, mario <ma...@include-once.org> wrote: >> P.S. >> Could we get like `dev-1.30.1` tags in between major releases? This is >> one of those significant new features that might warrant it. > > I agree with this! Especially since 1.30 was already increased: > https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/09fe92ad728cf5f45bb4a9e1169cfb16a6363510
just out of interest (I didn't really follow this thread): do you (and/or original poster) already compile your own binaries? For Linux and *BSD it's really trivial; the build process is easy and the build is very clean (see http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/tip/www/build.wiki for details). I have almost no experience on Windows systems, although for WinXP I used Visual Studio (IIRC) to build Fossil every now and then after a major fix, which is also quite painless. I didn't follow the evolution of Windows building, so perhaps now only Cygwin or Mingw are supported - no idea here; I just didn't have a need to recompile on Windows recently. IMHO it's safe to use Fossil trunk tip for daily work like many people here do. I myself have never lost a file because of Fossil (and don't know of anyone who did). Using an official Fossil release for 'safety' instead of trunk tip just doesn't cross my mind. In fact I don't think there's much hype here about official releases - I'm sure many people feel the same. (Ignore all of the above if I misunderstood your comment :-) Michai _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
